Now Playing Tracks

A few words from Noam Chomsky to Occupy San Diego, GSD, OSDnoTPP, and Free Education Collective:

The words “free trade agreement” should bring to mind the response attributed to Gandhi when he was asked what he thought about western civilization: “it might be a good idea.” Same with “free trade agreements.” Maybe they would be a good idea, maybe not, but the question scarcely arises in the real world. What are called “free trade agreements” have only a limited relation to free trade, or even trade at all, and are certainly not agreements, at least if the people of a country are regarded as its citizens.

The FTAs are investor rights agreements, negotiated mostly in secret by representatives of transnational corporations and the few powerful states that cater to their interests. The public is largely excluded, and often opposed. The agreements include highly protectionist elements, such as the monopoly pricing rights that impose enormous costs on consumers and have no legitimate justification. They interpret “trade” to include actions internal to command economies, as when a giant corporation produces parts in Indiana, ships them to a subsidiary in Mexico for assembly, then sells the product in California, with each border crossing called “trade” — a very large component of world “trade.” We did not call it “trade” when parts were produced in Leningrad, assembled in Poland, and sold in Moscow, all within the Soviet command economy. The concept of “trade” is further illuminated by events taking place right now. The World Bank has just ruled that the Canadian mining corporation Pacific Rim can proceed with its case against El Salvador for trying to preserve lands and communities from highly destructive gold mining. Under the investor rights agreements, the crime of imposing environmental constraints can be punished on the grounds that it harms potential profits. Predatory corporations must be guaranteed the right to destroy for profit, whatever the human cost. That is only a tiny sample of what is called “trade,” a category designed, not surprisingly, to enhance the power and privilege of the designers. The public should be concerned, informed, and engaged.

Noam Chomsky


San Diego Judge Deals Out Harsh Sentence to Occupy Activist – Throws Down Gaunlet to Occupy Movement

by  on APRIL 27, 2012 · 35 COMMENTS

in CIVIL DISOBEDIENCECIVIL RIGHTSCULTUREECONOMYORGANIZINGPOLITICSPOPULARSAN DIEGO

Andrew Fisher “Fish” with his dog. Both are considered very dangerous to the status of the 1%.

On the morning of April 24, an Occupy San Diego activist was sentenced to an overly harsh 90 days in jail and stiff probation conditions that have nothing to do with his protests.  And in doing so, the judge took it upon himself to throw down the gauntlet at the feet of the Occupy Wall Street movement in San Diego.

The activism of Andrew Fisher – nicknamed “Fish” – arrested and convicted of violating California Penal Code section 148 (a)(1) – obstruction of a peace officer, was not appreciated by Judge Richard Whitney, a San Diego County Superior Court judge.  Judge Whitney took it upon himself to single-handedly punish Fish and all other potential demonstrators with the Occupy movement. Whitney sentenced him to the 90 days, and with time off for time already served, with overcrowding and good behavior, he’s potentially looking at 43 days.

Whitney stepped out of his role as neutral arbiter and ordered Fish to enroll in a number of programs upon his release into 3 years of probation that have nothing to do with public protest and first amendment rights. Fisher was ordered to have no alcohol or drugs in his system for that time – even though neither alcohol or drugs were an issue in his arrest, in fact, he was sober at the time of the incident.

Supporters in court that morning reported that the judge told Fiser that unless he was real lucky and completed a number of programs and got a full time job, or full time education or combination thereof, that he was looking at time in state prison. The sentence was over and above what the prosecutors asked for, with the absurd conditions of his probation.

continue reading on OB Rag

The Community Vs. WalMart Saga Continues…

Unfortunately, a judge has ruled in favor of  WalMart at this time. Here is a write up from the action, followed by an article on the judge’s ruling to deny the TRO requested by the Coalition for Safe and Healthy Economic Progress. This also comes after a major story that just broke regarding WalMart bribing Mexican officials to build the supercenters, rather than going through the proper process to obtain building permits. Guess where Mexico isn’t too far from… (hint: starts with S and ends in “an Diego”).

Walmart Battle in Sherman/Logan Reaches New Heights as Community Members Get Involved

In case you haven’t been paying attention, there is something big brewing in Sherman Heights, a small tight-knit and predominately Latino community just east of downtown San Diego.  On Tuesday afternoon, community members driving by the historic Farmers Market building were shocked to see a huge chunk of the building demolished in preparation for a controversial proposed Walmart neighborhood market to be built in the location. As more community members rushed to the scene, construction of the building was put on halt and workers were sent home for the day.

ImageLocal community members and other concerned citizens and activist groups took to the scene the following day at 6:00 AM in an effort to prevent further demolition of the historic building and to demand that a stop-work order be issued until the permits could be assessed and the local community whose voice up to this point had been largely ignored. 40 community members armed with signs reading “We deserve better, Walmart says no!” in English and Spanish protested the demolition at the entrance to the construction zone while contractors and police watched in the vicinity.

Continue reading at WalMartTruth

KPBS reports on today’s ruling:

Judge Will Not Stop Walmart Construction In Sherman Heights

A judge today denied a bid for a temporary restraining order that would have stopped demolition work at the site of a Wal-Mart store in a landmark building in Sherman Heights.

Bulldozers took to the historic Farmer's Market building on Imperial Avenue in San Diego six weeks after Walmart announced it would convert it into one of its stores.

Enlarge this image

Above: Bulldozers took to the historic Farmer’s Market building on Imperial Avenue in San Diego six weeks after Walmart announced it would convert it into one of its stores.

Members of neighborhood and labor-affiliated groups claimed that Wal-Mart began demolishing the iconic Farmers Market building before issuing proper notice. They went to court last week in a bid to get the project shut down.

The retailer’s lawyers said it had the necessary permits to begin work on its future Wal-Mart Neighborhood Market, which will be smaller than the typical big-box store and focus mainly on groceries. The site is in a building that has a tower that dominates the skyline east of Interstate 5 near downtown.

A city permit calls for seismic retrofits of the structure, including the removal of the north wall, windows, roof and floor.

In his ruling, Judge Joel Pressman said the work was consistent with city-approved plans that call for maintaining the facade. He also said the building, in its current condition, was a safety hazard, so the plaintiffs - the Coalition for Safe and Healthy Economic Progress - should have acted sooner.

Continue reading at KPBS.org

SHERMAN HEIGHTS NEEDS EMERGENCY COMMUNITY SUPPORT, TOMORROW (WEDNESDAY 4/18) AT 6 AM!!! WE HAVE TO STOP WALMART FROM DISRESPECTING OUR COMMUNITIES!

We’re meeting at 6AM tomorrow at the proposed site for Walmart between 21st and 22nd and Imperial to demand that the city and city council district stop the demolition and apply a stop work order immediately!!

If you can’t make it:

Call Mayor Jerry Sanders (619) 236-6330 
Call City Council Member David Alvarez (619) 236-6688 

DEMAND THAT A STOP WORK ORDER BE PUT IN PLACE!!

An injunction for the stop work order is being called for by a lawyer in the community. Be prepared for the call to PACK THE COURTS and stand in solidarity with the people of Sherman/Logan Heights. Will happen sometime on Wednesday or Thursday. Stay tuned for updates


fine print: we are letting the community coalition take the lead, civil disobedience will be a last resort if they intend to continue demolition tomorrow. Everyone needs to keep in mind that there will be community members present that absolutely are not able to be arrested, and we must do our best to distance ourselves from and protect those who are in this position.

The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is not a legal lobby organization, but a corporativist think tank funded by hundreds of organizations to skew American laws in their favor. Secretly behind the closed doors of ALEC, corporations vote on amendments and changes to US law to directly benfit their business and boos profits, regardless of the effects on society, ecology, and the average American family. Along with US legislators, these corporations fund ALEC, are members on its boards, and vote to approve “model” bills with the legislators - all but one being conservative Republicans - then bring home and introduce in statehouses across the land as their own ideas and important public property innovations. Of course, never disclosing the corporations that actually crafted the bills.

ALEC boasts that it has over 1,000 of these bills introduced by legislative members every year, with one in every five of them enacted into law. During the 1999-2000 legislative cycle, ALEC legislators introduced more than 3100 pieces of legislation and more than 450 of these were enacted.

ALEC is a dangerous ruse that hundreds of big corporations and trade associations are using to advance their profit-first agendas, legislative loopholes, and “legal” crimes by rewriting the historic laws of America.

Learn more about how a few hundred millionaires are making unfair laws that negatively effect hundreds of thousands of Americans at www.alecexposed.org

brought to you by www.occupYrcorner.com

Thank you to the awesome people at occupYrcorner for the flier!

TOMORROW! #F11 #occupySD hosts the #OccupySoCal Conference! Begins at 8:30 AM! (note - schedule subject to change)

This Conference is being held to bring all Southern California Occupy’s together in Solidarity for one day to meet and learn from each other. http:// occupysandiegocounty.org/

Tentative Schedule: 

8:30 - 10:00 Gather at Civic Center where welcome packets, water and trail mix will be handed out.
10- 10:30 March to corners as a group, with people dropping out at their assigned corners.
10:30- 11:30 Historical Re-enactments/ Repeat of FREE SPEECH Speak outs on soap boxes
11:30 - 12:00 Start marching down E street and collect soap boxers until we are all gathered, marching to Children’s Park to join Save the Bill of Rights march on the NDAA. 
12:00 - 1:30 NDAA march and undecided as yet action concerning Sen. Feinstein
1:30 - 2:00 Transport by car, bus, trolley or foot to Balboa Park
2:00 - 2:30 Lunch is served - it’s a picnic! 
2:30 - 2:45 Marjory Cowen (potential speaker)
3:00 - 3:30 Introduction GA
3:30 - 5:30 Breakout session
4:30 - 6:30 GA report-backs
6:30 - 7:30 Dinner
7:30 - 10:00 Socialize, open mic, music, entertainment of all sorts, have fun together

10:00 or thereabouts, clean up.

Great article by #occupySD participant Kali Katt on @OBrag covering recent City Council session.

Occupy San Diego Calls Out the San Diego City Council on Protecting Free Speech Rights

by  on FEBRUARY 7, 2012 · 0 COMMENTS

in CIVIL RIGHTSSAN DIEGO

Chris McKay, a member of Occupy San Diego, appears before the San Diego City Council as they commemorate the Free Speech Fight of 1912. Photos by Kali Kat.

By Kali Kat / Special to the OB Rag

Now with it’s fourth month anniversary, Occupy San Diego continues to make a presence in the San Diego community, this morning challenging a proclamation by the City Council that the City of San Diego is re-committed to protecting the rights of free speech expression in San Diego.

The proclamation was in response to the 100 year anniversary of the Free Speech fight in San Diego during which the 1912 San Diego City Council passed Ordinance No. 4623 banning free speech or assembly in a 49 block radius of downtown San Diego.

Members of Occupy San Diego who have been recent victims of free speech repression in San Diego sat in the audience watching while the proclamation was presented by Council Members Marti Emerald and Tony Garcia to representatives of the local chapter of the ACLU and the San Diego and Imperial County Labor Councils.

While the proclamation itself expresses “deep dismay” for the former City Council’s actions and “formerly reiterates the Council’s repudiation of this shameful ordinance”, members of Occupy San Diego questioned the proclamation based on the recent actions of the City.

Continue reading…

To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union